Is the narrator a sexist character? If so, cite evidence from the text to support your opinion.
[Post your answer in the comment section by Friday November 13th at 11:59p]
Read this excerpt from an article that was first published in The Atlantic September 11, 2012 issue.
How Junot Diaz Wrote a Sexist Character, but Not a Sexist Book by Joe
Fassler
The Pulitzer Prize-winning author's new
collection takes an honest, critical—and sometimes unsettling—look at gender
dynamics.
Yunior de Las Casas—narrator of many of the stories in
Junot Diaz's new collection, This Is How You Lose Her—is capable of great turns
of phrase and stunning social insight. But his understanding of women is—as
Diaz told me in an interview by phone—"pretty f---ing limited." Take,
for instance, his description of Miss Lora, an aging seductress and high school
teacher:
"Miss Lora was too skinny. Had no hips
whatsoever. No breasts, either, no ass, even her hair failed to make the
grade."
This isn't a description of a person so much as a
mental checklist of physical attributes, a man scoping a woman's dimensions the
way a butcher might rove his eye over a calf. The book is filled with similar
descriptions; Yunior lavishes time on chronicles of body parts and erotic hydraulics. At the same time, he
spends little space engaging with the emotional lives of female
characters—their motivations, complications, and desires; their reasons for
entering and leaving relationships; the psychological effects of his wounding
betrayals. It's almost as though Yunior doesn't have the depth to contemplate a
female psychology, let alone make one real for a third party. And when he does
directly address the reader—like when he tells us Nilda, his brother's
girlfriend, has "a chest you wouldn't believe"—he assumes we're
high-fiving heterosexual males (just like he is).
This failure of imagination worsens Yunior's
mistreatment of his romantic partners, whom he betrays serially and without flinching.
But Yunior's cavalier
descriptions of the way he dupes and wounds these women are at odds with the
sadness he feels when they find out. Diaz writes that this despair is
"pelagic," sea-like in scope, and the feeling only deepens with time.
Part of the heartbreak of this book is watching Yunior make the same
self-destructive decisions again and again—and still he lacks the insight or
vocabulary to understand why he feels so blown away. We feel it in the way he
mourns: Yunior loves these women, and he would do anything to keep them if only
he knew how.
The book, then, is the story of late-blooming empathy,
a long path towards gender enlightenment. We only see Yunior's dawning
awareness of his subjectivity on the final pages of the book, in an epic called
"The Cheater's Guide to Love"; otherwise, Diaz's commits fully to his
chauvinistic method-acting. That's what makes This Is How You Lose Her such a
brave and risky book. How can an author write so
convincingly from the perspective of a machismo cad and still write a book that
is not itself sexist?
Diaz has walked this line before: In Drown, his 1996
debut short-story collection, and in 2007's Pulitzer Prize-winning The Brief
Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao. He told me that sometimes people—usually women—lambaste him at his readings and
public appearances.
"There's plenty of people out there who are like,
'F--- you. You are endorsing this shit. Your portrayal of women is f---ed
up,'" he told me. "It happens all the time."
But then, there are women who defend his portrayals as
honest, brave, and sufficiently complex. "They'll argue the exact
opposite," Diaz said. (It's worth noting that men seldom ask questions
about women at all, according to Diaz. "Rarely do I get dudes who want to
talk gender," Diaz told me. "That's the strange thing about
privilege.")
How can a book's portrayal of women be praised and
criticized at the same time? Part of it may stem from Diaz's unflinching
authorial vision, which requires giving voice to the silenced victims of
history and of our moment. But Oscar Wao's many scenes of brutal violence,
including rape, required a strong stomach. As a one-star GoodReads review of
the book, written by a woman, explained:
"I recognize the literary abilities of Junot
Diaz. The book is well-written; the language hypnotic in fact. This book, for
all the things that bothered me, is hard to put down.
So, the one star rating is more of a reaction to the
emotional upheaval this book left me with. I just can't get behind a book so
completely misogynistic. And I don't know the author's intent, and I'm afraid I
don't know nearly enough about Dominican history as I should, but I was just
left really quite devastated by it.
Women are objects in this novel. Objects for men to
own, to destroy, to collect as many as they can. Almost every female character
in the novel is cheated on, raped, attacked, beaten or murdered; sometimes more
than once, sometimes all five. And while I understand the violence of the
Dominican Republic during the time of Trujillo,
I guess what pisses me off is the flippancy with which the narrator talks about
it...
I'm not necessarily offended by these things being
written about in this way...if there's a point. Perhaps a scathing commentary about the misogyny in Dominican society. But he doesn't get there and
I was left with so much anger and confusion." …
Still, there are clues about the author's alignment.
In This Is How You Lose Her, Diaz cites the fact that Yunior's behavior results
in persistent unhappiness. "All of Yunior's f---ed-up visions of women
never get him anything," Diaz told me. "They end up with him more
alone, more frustrated, more aware of his dehumanization and farther away from
the thing that he deeply longs for—a human connection." The narratives in
no way reward Yunior's perspective; in fact, they serve to undermine and
subvert it (just not in obvious ways).
Perhaps the author's stance is clearest in
"Otravida, Otravez," one of the collection's most affecting and
successful stories. The story achieves an abrupt shift in perspective: It's
narrated by a Dominican-American woman named Yasmin whose boyfriend's wife
stayed behind in Santo Domingo. When Yasmin discovers the wife's pleading
letters, she must question her role in a family's dissolution: Please, please,
mi querido husband, tell me what it is. How long did it take before your wife
stopped mattering?
The language becomes more brooding and gentle in this
story. By displaying his stylistic range, Diaz reminds us just how subjective
Yunior's brutishness is. Furthermore, Yasmin's portrayal veers drastically from
the butt-waist-bust women who populate Yunior's stories. She's sensitive,
capable of stunning insight and self-reflection, but she isn't perfect or
romanticized. Her crime, betrayal, is Yunior's, and her participation is
similarly complex. Ultimately, she is able to do what Yunior can't—achieve
empathy for someone else. Another woman leaps from a stack of letters,
full-blown, into her mind, and it causes her to change her life. …
[To read the entire article go to http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/09/how-junot-diaz-wrote-a-sexist-character-but-not-a-sexist-book/262169/]Vocabulary - Find definitions and translations for all of the underlined words found in the excerpt. On paper due in class on Monday November 16, 2015.
Post a Comment - Answer this question: [How can an author write so convincingly from the perspective of a machismo cad and still write a book that is not itself sexist?]
After posting your answer you will also have to respond meaningfully to a classmate's answer. Follow rules of academic discourse.
Due online by Sunday November 15, 2015 at 11:59pm.